• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
Logo 468x120

Severe Weather 2024

KevinH

Member
Messages
1,818
Reaction score
2,890
Location
West Central GA
Go figure, for the last several runs (although it did just kind of abruptly pop up with yesterday's 06Z run, with a rather different look prior to that) the GFS has been advertising a BEAUTIFUL setup in Iowa a week from now, Sunday 4/14. Broad-based neutral to slightly negatively tilted trough, left exit region punching into the warm sector beneath a cold pocket aloft, screaming LLJ - but I know I won't be able to chase that day because it's my mom's birthday. :p
Well yeah… you should sing instead of chase that day…
 
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
4,645
Location
Madison, WI
Well yeah… you should sing instead of chase that day…

Phew...it went away on today's 12Z run after being there for about 5 runs straight up until the 06Z. Although the general pattern isn't too far off so it could come back. This run, the main trough cuts off in the southwest with the stronger flow confined to the southern Plains.
 
Messages
171
Reaction score
376
Location
Kentucky
Go figure, for the last several runs (although it did just kind of abruptly pop up with yesterday's 06Z run, with a rather different look prior to that) the GFS has been advertising a BEAUTIFUL setup in Iowa a week from now, Sunday 4/14. Broad-based neutral to slightly negatively tilted trough, left exit region punching into the warm sector beneath a cold pocket aloft, screaming LLJ - but I know I won't be able to chase that day because it's my mom's birthday. :p
You could be like Reed Timmer and take your mom chasing like he did for Mother’s Day a few years back haha

On another note, I haven’t had a chance to look at the El Niño transition to Enso neutral update.
Worth pondering if any el niño “teleconnection remnants” that remain could still play a part in influencing weather for April. Similar to how its influence was felt January to Mid-March severe weather wise. I know the official prediction was nino to neutral some time in April with a transition to La Niña later in the year. Could yield more “coastal based” threats instead of incursions into Dixie proper.

Not a safe assumption by any means, especially for April, the premier southern Severe weather month. Seems like last year we all thought April would be crazy after big outbreaks in January, March, and April 1st but it was a rather quiet month by April standards.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,205
Reaction score
4,864
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
Go figure, for the last several runs (although it did just kind of abruptly pop up with yesterday's 06Z run, with a rather different look prior to that) the GFS has been advertising a BEAUTIFUL setup in Iowa a week from now, Sunday 4/14. Broad-based neutral to slightly negatively tilted trough, left exit region punching into the warm sector beneath a cold pocket aloft, screaming LLJ - but I know I won't be able to chase that day because it's my mom's birthday. :p
Kill two birds with one stone. Take your mom storm chasing for her birthday. :D
 

JPWX

Member
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
4,132
Location
Smithville MS
Couple of distinct supercell structures near the TN/MS line, with modest couplets apparent, but not warned even for SVR.
And not even a Flood Watch either for North MS yet. But not to worry. 4-7 inches of rain with locally 7+ thru Thursday won't cause any significant issues whatsoever..... LOL!
 
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
4,645
Location
Madison, WI
This is the system I was mentioning a few days ago. Fortunately for me it slowed down a bit AND I was able to get next week Wednesday off from work, so although I won't be able to chase Monday I should be able to chase the Midwest portion of the event Tuesday afternoon/evening, assuming it doesn't completely fall apart.
 

lake.effect

Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
160
Location
Chicago
Hey all,
Long time lurker, first time poster. Love to see this forum continue to go strong!

One question that has plagued me in my years of armchair meteorology: what's the deal with "contaminated soundings"? Specifically on short range CAMs (NAM in particular). Often the CAMs produce monster STP parameters but the sounding indicates "marginal tor" as the hazard. Yesterday's model runs had a few good examples of this phenomenon.

Curious to understand what causes this and why the agencies that develop the model change them so they don't create those anomolies.

Thanks!
 

Clancy

Member
Messages
2,699
Reaction score
4,835
Location
Macland, Georgia
Hey all,
Long time lurker, first time poster. Love to see this forum continue to go strong!

One question that has plagued me in my years of armchair meteorology: what's the deal with "contaminated soundings"? Specifically on short range CAMs (NAM in particular). Often the CAMs produce monster STP parameters but the sounding indicates "marginal tor" as the hazard. Yesterday's model runs had a few good examples of this phenomenon.

Curious to understand what causes this and why the agencies that develop the model change them so they don't create those anomolies.

Thanks!
Welcome! Coming from a mere hobbyist, those model hazard modes are algorithmically-driven and as such they can definitely have their moments. When a sounding is contaminated by the presence of convection, usually a thunderstorm, it distorts the presentation of the atmosphere in that location, causing it to present differently from the actual environment. In these cases, since the environment on the modelled sounding is "off" from what is expected in the ambient atmosphere surrounding a tornadic supercell, it'll give off a marginal hazard type.
 
Back
Top