Will these damage points be available in your anniversary article?Thanks! It's based on a ton of sources - newspaper reports, books, info I'd gathered back when I wrote my article, the paper from Bob Johns et al, etc. For the width specifically, I tried to rely on actual damage points whenever possible and filled in the rest with first-hand accounts. Since a lot of those accounts were estimates (i.e. "the path was between half and three-quarters of a mile wide") I mostly used the lower figures.
It also involved a degree of interpretation because the inflow and/or RFD was so unusually intense with this storm that at some points damage occurred up to two or three miles from the core, so the exact cutoff between that vs. tornadic damage was a little fuzzy. In some places my path is probably more representative of like an EF1-EF2 contour rather than EF0, but I'd rather err on the conservative side.
So yeah, the short answer is a lot of damage points. Just.. so, so many damage points lol