JPWX
Member
So question about Tallahassee power outage. Was it mainly caused from the tornado or a combination of both straight line winds/tornado?
Both. There were 2 EF-2 Tornadoes that hit the city simultaneously, also coinciding with straight-line winds the NWS says were "at least 100 mph".So question about Tallahassee power outage. Was it mainly caused from the tornado or a combination of both straight line winds/tornado?
Dang!!!!Both. There were 2 EF-2 Tornadoes that hit the city simultaneously, also coinciding with straight-line winds the NWS says were "at least 100 mph".
Sounds like a running theme the past few days...yuck!Going to be significant damage in Lake Charles. They just got raked by multiple tornadoes (including one going right through downtown) and destructive straight line winds associated with an embedded mesovortex.
Looked like a near repeat of Tallahassee last week…which ended up with tornado #1 two blocks south of my daughter’s place.Going to be significant damage in Lake Charles. They just got raked by multiple tornadoes (including one going right through downtown) and destructive straight line winds associated with an embedded mesovortex.
Going to be significant damage in Lake Charles. They just got raked by multiple tornadoes (including one going right through downtown) and destructive straight line winds associated with an embedded mesovortex.
Yeah. I was curious as to why it wasn't at least a reported tornado warned storm, but I'm not NWS.I've seen storms get a TORR for less...
You are a meteorologist though, aren't you? Therefore, your input is valid unlike that "NWS FORECASTS R GARBAG" guy.Yeah. I was curious as to why it wasn't at least a reported tornado warned storm, but I'm not NWS.
I am. That storm did have a tight rotation couplet when it was nearing the radar site. Though no debris couplet or signature from what I could tell.You are a meteorologist though, aren't you? Therefore, your input is valid unlike that "NWS FORECASTS R GARBAG" guy.
We have a state named Idaho?So not directly related to the storm system in the SE, but today was quite a bust up in SE Idaho by the SPC. Not even a marginal outlook on any of the day 1 outlooks, and there’s over a dozen wind reports including one of 80MPH. There’s been warnings as a line/cluster marched east across the state.
It must be a troll post, everyone knows Idaho doesn't exist (just like "wyoming").We have a state named Idaho?
We do, allegedly. El Dorado also exists, but instead of being made of gold, all I saw there were tornadoes, wheat fields and a sign pointing to Wichita.We have a state named Idaho?
An upper level trough moving at a snails pace through the Tennessee
Valley will be the primary player in our weather over the next 36
hours. Southerly flow ahead of the trough will continue to advect
moisture northward, allowing low clouds, haze and light rain showers
to continue in the region this morning. Later this afternoon it will
draw a warm front northward into central Georgia. This front should
serve as a focal point for thunderstorms between 4 PM and 10 PM.
Though additional elevated thunderstorms may form north of the warm
front in northern Georgia. Diurnal heating and rising surface
dewpoints (peaking near 70 degrees) behind the warm front should
allow SBCAPE values to peak in the 1000 to 2000 J/kg range this
afternoon. This instability should be coupled with adequate shear
values (0 to 6 km values between 25 and 40 kt) for isolated
supercell development near the warm front. Note the mean STP values
in the 1 to 3 range in the 00Z HREF guidance. Mid level lapse rates
have also improved in the CAM guidance compared to what was
projected yesterday (mean values are now in the 6.0 to 7.0 C/km
range). Given these considerations today`s Marginal Risk (Level 1 of
5) appears to be a higher end Marginal. This is especially true
along a line from Columbus to Macon to Augusta, where proximity to
the warm front will elevate the severe potential. Along this line
damaging winds are the main concern, but large hail or a brief
tornado are possible. Further north the elevated nature of the
storms should lead to a lower potential for damaging winds or hail.